[vc_row full_width=”stretch_row” css=”.vc_custom_1531049302498{background-color: #1b1b1b !important;}”][vc_column][vc_wp_custommenu title=”Hot topics” nav_menu=”13″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Major banks oppose class certification in stock loan collusion lawsuit

Businessman Holding money US dollar bills on digital stock market financial exchange information and Trading graph background, Bank antitrust stock loan concept(Photo Credit: Joyseulay/Shutterstock)

Major banks stock loan market collusion class action lawsuit overview:

  • Who: JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, UBS and stock loan platform EquiLend filed an objection to a judge’s decision to certify a class of investors who filed a class action lawsuit against them.
  • Why: The investors argue the major banks colluded to kill competition in the stock loan market.
  • Where: The bank class action lawsuit was filed in the New York federal court.

A group of major banks filed an objection to a New York federal judge’s decision to certify a proposed class of investors claiming the banks colluded to squash competition in the stock loan market.

Banks JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and UBS, along with stock loan platform EquiLend, argue US Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave “abrogated the court’s responsibility to rigorously analyze the evidence.”

In their objection, the major banks claim that the decision to certify the proposed class of investors should be reversed and that the investors class certification motion should be denied.

Judge Cave previously called for the partial certification of the proposed class of investors, determining that the proposed class had met all of the necessary requirements, Law360 reports.

Bank class action in limbo as defendants say they plan to argue specific claims

Meanwhile, the banks argue they plan to present individualized evidence when the complaint goes to trial that will predominate over a class complaint, according to the bank class action objection.

Specifically, the banks say they plan to show that specific class members were not harmed by their allegations that the financial institutions had colluded to kill competition in the market for stock loans.

The banks further disagreed with Judge Cave’s ruling that they are not allowed to dispute whether or not an investor would have chosen to join a platform had it not been for their alleged conduct.

“That was error,” the banks say in their objection. “Where, as here, defendants can make plausible showings that individual class members were unharmed, defendants have a constitutional right to make those showings at trial.”

A group of public pension funds originally filed the bank class action lawsuit in 2017, arguing they had colluded to boycott startup electronic platforms and used EquiLend, which the banks jointly control, to buy up and shut down the competition.

Do you believe the major banks colluded to squash competition in the stock loan market? Let us know in the comments!

The plaintiffs are represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC.

the bank class action lawsuit is Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., case no. 1:17-cv-06221, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.



Related Posts

Major banks oppose class certification in stock loan collusion lawsuit

Biden to provide student loan relief to those who make less than $125,000, extends payment freeze

ITT Tech student loans worth $3.9 billion to be canceled

$3.25M student loan class action over prepayment settled

Toyota Motor Credit Corp. (TMCC) GAP fee refund $59M class action settlement

Class Action Alleges Internet Lender Violates Lending Laws, Claims Tribal Immunity

Credit Suisse Class Action Settlements Total $106M in Alleged Stock Loan Conspiracy

Navient to Cancel 66,000 Student Loans Amid $1.85B Predatory Loan Settlement

Judge Tells FTC 1,300 Consumer Complaints Over Payday Loan Companies’ Coupon Scheme Could Be Hearsay

Bank Of America Agrees To Pay Mortgage Borrowers $1.2 Million To Resolve Kickback Claims

Pawnshop Co FirstCash Charges Military Families Illegally High Interest Rates, Says CFPB

Mr Cooper, Nationstar Faces Class Action Over Thousands of Unauthorized Mortgage Payments

Citibank Violated Mortgage Agreements by Not Paying Interest on Escrow, Class Action Says

American First Finance, Unlicensed in California, Charges Illegally High Interest, Says Class Action

Lender Think Finance Cheats Virginia Consumers Out of $68 Million in Interest, Says Class Action Lawsuit

LendUp Loans Failed to Fulfill Promise of Better Loan Terms to Repeat Borrowers, New Class Action Lawsuit Alleges

Freedom Mortgage Reaches $2.7 Million Settlement Over Unnecessary Home Visit Allegations

RoundPoint Mortgage Harasses Customers, Threatens Illegal Fees, Class Action Alleges

Green Financing Firm Ygrene Misled Consumers About Terms of Home Loans, Class Action Alleges

Wells Fargo Should Pay Extra $22M to Additional Customers Who Lost Their Homes Due to Software Error, Judge Says

Comments are closed.